Archive for the ‘Loan Modifications’ Category

Manhattan Real Estate Lawyer shows you how to pick a Manhattan Real Estate Attorney

Monday, July 13th, 2009

As a New York City Real Estate Attorney, Ive been asked to post this for quite some time.  The reason I decided not to post it for so long is because it can come off as self serving.  ”Oh a lawyer tells you the bad things about other lawyers so he can get your business!”  Kind of, but thats not really the point.  You see, I, like almost every other lawyer in the world has made occassioal mistakes. Anyone who says otherwise, no matter how experienced, is simply lying.  It happens more than once to the best of us.  So why write this then?  Because I think we need to take a good hard look at ourselves and see what works and what doesn’t, and what should earn a fee and what shouldnt.  To be perfectly honest a lawyer might not view $1000 or $2000 the way you would. If you do enough closings, $1000 may not seem like a lot, but to a client, it is.  And so here are some tips that Ive compiled about how/when/what you should look for in a Real Estate attorney before you cough up that hard earned money.

1.  Pleasantness on the phone during the initial call.  Lawyers may think I’m crazy for saying this, and thats fine, but I think one of the most overlooked keys in picking out a good Real Estate Attorney in Manhattan, Brooklyn, etc., is the way he/she talks and LISTENS to you during the initial phone call.  Are you being rushed?  Is the attorney not listening to what you’re saying?  Is he/she simply trying to force you to come in for an appointment?  If thats the case, this should raise a red flag.  As lawyers, after a few real estate deals, most of them seem to look and sound a like.  The problem is that there are critical differences in each and every deal and you don’t want to use someone who may think of you as Real Estate closing #45 for the year as opposed to Don and Alice, or Don and Adam (its 2009) buying their first home.  Again, the tone of the phone call may not mean the attorney will never listen to your issues, but it may be a red flag to look out for.

2. Fees.  Im going to get killed for saying this, and rightly so, but I haven’t come across any deal, which in my mind, validates a lawyers fee over $1500 at most.  Unless the lawyer is setting up a Sponsor for new construction, the work is the same for a $400,000 and a $1.4,000,00.00 deal.  The amount of work that can go into a closing may differ, but it won’t differ greatly.  Watch out for this.

3. Responsiveness.  This is the most crucial aspect of picking and sticking with an attorney.  If you email, call, write him/her, do they get back to you in a reasonable (24 hour) period of time.  If not, in my opinion, that is a serious serious problem.  In my Brooklyn office, there are approximately 30 attorneys within a span of 3 city blocks.  The only legitimate way to differentiate yourself is through responsiveness.  We as attorneys MUST get back to you clients quite quickly, otherwise we run the risk of you leaving and going somewhere else.  Thats why its critical that your attorney get back to you quickly.  I have clients who barely ask a question through the entire closing process and I have others who think they’re getting paid by the question.  Either way if you’re attorney doesn’t respond its a problem.  Especially if you brought it up to them (usually a message from his/her receptionist saying “why doesn’t the attorney call me back) and they still don’t respond.

4.   Is he/she showing up to the closing, or is someone else?  Again, something you should ask.  You paid for Rick the Attorney and not Sam the assistant.  If you really want the attorney to show, make sure you ask ahead of time.  If they can’t necessarily commit, you may want to think again.

I will have some more tips up soon, and again, this is personal opinion.  If you’re happy because your aunt Ruth told you that the attorney is amazing, thats fine.  These are just some things I think clients should consider.

New York Mortgage Modification Mess

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

Here’s how bad it is out there.  I have a client who had his house foreclosed on about two months ago.  I called the bank to see if we could possibly circumvent any deficiencies without filing for Bankruptcy.  The Bank claimed the home was not foreclosed.  I faxed the bank papers from the foreclosure sale, signed by a referee.  The Bank claimed the house was not foreclosed.  I spoke to a manager for some time…who agreed that the house was foreclosed upon after making sure I wasn’t “duped” by the paperwork which was signed by a referee and filed with the court.  The manager then asked me if my client wanted to modify his mortgage.  I explained…calmly…that my client no longer owned the house, as it was foreclosed upon and someone else now lived there.  The lady took a pause….a long one…and said…”lets see what we can do about keeping your client in this house.”  Folks, this thing does not get better for a while.

Pass Me Some New York Loan Modifications…

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

Dear Daniel:

I make approximately $50,000 a year and have two mortgages totaling $600,000 and the house is worth approximately $400,000.  Should I consider a loan modification?  

 

Dear Daniel:

I make approximately $50,000 a year and have a mortgage of $310,000 and the home is worth $340,000.  It is also an interest only mortgage which is set to reset in one year.  Should I consider a loan modification?

These questions are just two examples of the type of questions on loan modifications I hear on a daily basis.  My answer to the first question is a resounding NO and the answer to the second one is a maybe (you cannot have a “resounding” maybe).  Here’s why:

The first person has to figure out that they are not keeping that house.  Its $200,000 underwater and no loan modification is going to help them.  Again, I should say that there are tons of variables here (savings, cc debt, family size, jobs, etc.) but overall what I believe would make the most sense is to walk away from the house altogether.  What I am finding is that many people have such an emotional attachment to these “things” that they refuse to move under any circumstances.  And these arent people that were in that house for 20 some years.  They are people that purchased in the last few years and now, almost subconsciously, refuse to admit a mistake was made.  Even if these people did modify, a $600,000 mortgage, with property taxes and upkeep, would swallow most of that person’s take him income.  Given that the house is $200,000 underwater as it is, it simply DOES NOT make sense to modify.  If you walk away from the home, you can be sure that the difference owed after it sells can be wiped out by filing a Bankruptcy.

 

The second scenario is a bit trickier because the mortgage amount is lower and the house isn’t as deep underwater.  The homeowner can potentially convince the lender to lower the principle amount and also modify the terms of the loan.  And even if the principal remains the same, it is much easier for a home to appreciate by 10% in a few years, then 33%.  Again, a ton of variables have to come into play here when making the decision, but the one variable that shouldn’t come into play is emotion.  This house is a “thing”.  It’s not a person.  It’s a home that you expected to go up in value, but which is now depreciating and is taking you with it.  Financially speaking, it doesnt make sense to keep throwing money that you don’t have at a depreciating asset.  

If you purchased a new car for an interest only loan at $30,000 and the car was consistently dropping in value and you knew you couldn’t afford the car anymore, would you continue to struggle and go deeper into debt to pay for the car for years, or would you realize you overpaid for the car and give it up?  Most people would realize that they made an error in valuation and move on.  For some reason homes dont have the same effect on people.  Like I said previously, take emotion out of the equation and do whats financially sensible for you and your family.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING: We are a debt relief agency, we help people file for Bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy Code. Past performance is no gaurantee or future results. This Blog/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.